DuPont Analysis for Microsoft and Google
Jun 01
Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) are two standard measures used to evaluate the health and future prospects of a company. This type of analysis was introduced in the 1920s, being employed by the DuPont corporation. It algebraically splits ROE into three different measures
- Profit margin
- Turnover
- Leverage
This is accomplished by starting with the ratio of net income to equity
Then multiplying by assets and sales, like this
Some shuffling and we can get the three items listed above
Variation
Some authors prefer to normalize out taxes and interest in the ROA and ROE equations, so that in place of net income they instead use after-tax interest plus net income.
DuPont Analysis for Google
Assets | 96,692.00 |
Equity | 75,473.00 |
Net income | 11,193.00 |
Interest Expense | 85.00 |
Tax rate | 16.58% |
After-tax interest | 70.91 |
After-tax interest + Net Income | 11,263.91 |
ROA | 11.6% |
ROE | 14.9% |
DuPont | |
Sales | 53,499 |
profit margin | 21.1% |
turnover | 55.3% |
leverage | 128.1% |
DuPont Analysis for Microsoft
Assets | 134,105.00 |
Equity | 76,688.00 |
Net income | 16,406.00 |
Interest Expense | 405.00 |
Tax rate | 22.85% |
After-tax interest | 312.46 |
After-tax interest + Net Income | 16,718.46 |
ROA | 12.5% |
ROE | 21.8% |
DuPont | |
Sales | 76,012.00 |
profit margin | 22.0% |
turnover | 56.7% |
leverage | 174.9% |
Observations
Profit margin and turnover are roughly the same for both companies. However, Microsofts total Assets are greater than Google’s by about 40%. That significantly increases Microsoft’s leverage position. The higher ratio for leverage may shed some light on my previous analysis showing that Microsoft has a higher bond rating and a higher debt load to bonds.